Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I'll be blunt: I considered the issue of posting from non-reading addresses > and then wait "Wait. What am I *thinking*? Hotmail gives out *free* email > addresses. Why should I have to deal with *more* spam just so these folks > can have chronically broken setups?"
This isn't the only reason people post with addresses differing from their subscription address. *You* control the spam entering your mailbox. It is not the list's responsibility, which the spam could easily have circumvented. Obscurity is not security. > I vote for closing it off. I guarantee it will reduce the spam to just > about nil. Until spammers start forging harvested subscriber addresses. -- Drew
