Re: FALSE == 1

[Santiago Vila]

Nick Holgate wrote:
>  +#define FALSE   ((int) 1)
>  +#define TRUE    ((int) 0)

This is contrary to usual logic which says that

if (3>2) { 
  whatever
}

and

if (TRUE) {
  whatever
}

should be the equivalent things.

Why not change the "wrong" definitions of TRUE and FALSE in whatever place
they are found, instead of propagating this madness even more?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]