Re: what is the whole purpose of kernel-image-di?

[Ethan Benson]

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 10:34:52PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > 2.4.1 kernel.org does not build on PPC.  Sigh.
> 
> 2.4.0 is ok, right? I guess I'll hold off of 2.4.1 for now..

2.4.0 is even worse (read useless) on powerpc.  (linus merged some
2.4 powerpc code in 2.4.1 but obviously not enough)

at the moment the only 2.4 kernel code that works on powerpc is the
forked bk trees.  2.2.18 kernel.org however is fully powerpc
functional.

-- 
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/

PGP signature