Glenn McGrath wrote:
> The other thing is that the "official" udpkg will probably want to stay
> standalone, so changes to debian cvs udpkg may have to be manually fixed
> in busybox cvs as well to keep things in sync. Thats no big deal though
> i can do that.

I don't see why this would be necessary. I'm pretty sure Randolph
wouldn't mind moving it into busybox to save 6k.

Erik: udpkg is roughly equivilant to 
        dpkg --force-essential --force-overwrites --force-conflicts
        --force-dodgy-status-file-updating --force-no-postinst-scripts
        :-)
So a user running it on their desktop is in for a rude surprise..

-- 
see shy jo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to