On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 04:54:29AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> Why would it be another flavor? AFAIK, flavors are for either a patch
> which renders the system unusable for some (udma66) or a set of likely
> hardware (idepci, compact).
Since we're not doing initrd, if the user's root fs is reiser, it has to
be compiled in.
> BTW, Herbert, do you think we should be pushing for kernel 2.4.x in
> woody boot-floppies?
I guess it depends on how much time it would take for the boot floppies to
be updated for it, on all architectures. If time permits, it would be good
to keep our options open and support both 2.2 and 2.4.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
