Your message dated 24 Mar 2001 17:29:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line hwclock on alpha
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2000 09:02:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 09 04:02:01 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from li-6-59.cytanet.com.cy (UP1000.nkk.home) [::ffff:195.14.146.59]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13XgWO-0007TF-00; Sat, 09 Sep 2000 04:02:00 -0500
Received: from localhost (root@localhost)
by UP1000.nkk.home (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id IAA00642
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 9 Sep 2000 08:26:14 GMT
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 08:26:14 +0000 (UTC)
From: Neoklis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Neoklis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian bugtrack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Potato Base2_2 bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: base
Version: 2.2
During the first boot of a potato base installation on a UP1000
the clock configuration section tried to set the clock to
GMT as I specified, but the year in the date string was 2020.
This is a bug that exists in SuSE 6.3 AXP as well, e.g. when
installation is complete, all files are datestamped in the
year 2020 and need to be touched. I cancelled the clock setup
to avoid problems, especially clock skew alarms with "make".
This problem is very likely caused by the "hwclock" program
not recognising the UP1000 as a --funky-toy machine (please
see the hwclock manual). This also causes the date to be read
intermitently somewhere in the year 2200 on bootup, causing
problems.
This can be fixed by using the --funky-toy (-F) option when
calling hwclock anywhere. It also seems to be fixed if a kernel
can be compiled with "enhanced rtc support" resulting in a
/proc/rtc file with correct date info. The maintainer of
hwclock is aware of this and the next version will recognise
"Nautilus" as a --funky-toy machine.
--
Regards
Neoklis Kyriazis
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 71189-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Mar 2001 22:29:20 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 24 16:29:20 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl106.dsl.bway.net (arroz.fake) [216.220.104.106]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14gwX9-0007ev-00; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:29:20 -0600
Received: from arroz.fake (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by arroz.fake (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED3893802
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 17:29:43 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: hwclock on alpha
From: Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 24 Mar 2001 17:29:43 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 9
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Presumably this is fixed in hwclock upstream. If not, someone should
file a bug or reopen this bug against the package that provides that.
If someone wants to cram this into Potato updates, they need to file a
bug against hwclock, but I doubt it will be allowed.
--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onshored.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
