On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:59:41AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > It is actually a side-effect of my changes to get rid of all those > > annoying perl warnings. I forgot that mdadm has a debconf template while > > making those changes. > > Hmmm, reading this, I understand that there are situations where mdadm > templates are used during the installation. > > If we follow the theory that drove us up to now, it means that mdadm > should be added to one of the D-I "levels", similarly to xorg, samba, > popcon and a few other "regular" packages that are likely to display > something during some kind of installs. > > I would then be tempted to add mdadm to "level 4" as it will be used > only in some "specific" situations. Am I right ?
mdadm is installed on every system using software RAID partitions.
The templates allowing one to define software RAID partitions in
mdcfg-utils are in sublevel 3.
That would make mdadm sublevel 3 to me, but mdadm should not ask
questions at high priority, so sublevel 4 would be fine, if I did get a
proper grasp of the logic beyond sublevels… :)
Cheers,
--
Jérémy Bobbio .''`.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
