On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:10:44PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Frans Pop ([email protected]): > > > > Could we use this opportunity to drop this "for you". It doesn't add > > > much information and I always find this quite clumky. I don't really > > > see why a given action would be made "for me". > > > > > > "No file systems have been mounted automatically." would sound more > > > neutral to me. > > > > Agreed. > > Colin, would you object?
No objection on principle, but "No ... have been mounted automatically" doesn't read quite right to me: it sounds a bit like "we have this automation that has cleverly mounted no file systems, since that would have been hard for you to do manually". :-) How about just "No file systems have been mounted."? -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
