On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 11:05:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Oh, OK, I'm completely wrong again :) So much for that. I wonder why > we're so much tighter on space, then. we still have a bit more cruft then other arches, but not that much really. we are again fine with a debloated busybox package ive been using locally. (using the Config.h patch i posted to the list). as soon as a busybox enters woody that doesn't include loads of cruft things will be fine. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
- Re: build failure on ia32 Ethan Benson
- Re: build failure on ia32 Erik Andersen
- Re: build failure on ia32 Ethan Benson
- Re: build failure on ia32 Erik Andersen
- Re: build failure on ia32 John H. Robinson, IV
- Re: build failure on ia32 Glenn McGrath
- Re: build failure on ia32 Ethan Benson
- Re: build failure on ia32 Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: build failure on ia32 Ethan Benson
- Re: build failure on ia32 Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: build failure on ia32 Ethan Benson
- Re: build failure on ia32 Erik Andersen
- Re: slimmer busybox (was Re: build failure on ia... Erik Andersen