On Monday 29 June 2009, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 03:05:22PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Sunday 28 June 2009, Colin Watson wrote: > > > I think we should stop asking this question entirely. Hardly anyone > > > really needs anything other than pc105, except for the Brazilian > > > and Japanese cases that can be derived automatically from the > > > keyboard layout anyway. > > > > How appropriate is pc105 as a default? > > > > None of the 7 keyboards [1] I have here has the extra "LSGT" key ("<" > > + ">"), so they are all pc104... > > As Steve says, the distinction is not one that is important to present > to users. You don't care if you have an extra symbol on a key you don't > have. You *would* care if you end up with an important symbol you can't > type because you don't have the relevant key (this happens with > Brazilian, where "/" goes on the 106th key ...), but if that happens > you're using the wrong layout anyway.
OK. I wasn't sure about that, so I asked :-) Thanks both. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org