Hi all, > So Adam, is it agreeable that I upload a version of busybox to the > main archive with these changes? David has now validated that this is > viable and saves space.
earlier in this list it has been suggested to have a busybox-bf package in addition to the normal busybox package. I would strongly encourage this, though for different reasons: 1. Right now I'm working on a customized initrd for our beowulf cluster (I use netboot/pxelinux, so I'm not limited to 1440Kb). The testing process of b-f for woody has found quite some bugs for busybox, which is a good thing. So I want to use the newest versions available. But currently quite often some functions are added/disabled which keeps me changing my scripts. 2. People might like to install busybox in a chroot to test it out. Having all functions available at a fingertip would be really nice (instead of having to build it yourself to test the other functionality). There is more use for busybox. So please add an additional busybox-bf package that you can use to reduce size aiming at b-f. Kind regards, Jens Ruehmkorf -- ruehmkorf at informatik dot uni hyphen koeln dot de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
