On Tuesday 09 March 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Also: Is there any way to make sure there's no (kernel) version > > mismatch between *-modules packages in the future? > > That still stands.
Problem is that if we ask to remove the loop-aes udebs for .30 for unstable (which is the only real option ATM), they would also be removed from testing. That would break loop-aes support for netboot installs and weekly built CDs based on the alpha1 release. I would personally prefer the problem to remain for daily images over breaking things for the alpha1 release. The crypto people will hopefully come up with some solution for loop-aes support with .32 kernels before Squeeze. But if there is no solution before the next D-I release, we will have to ask for removal of the loop-aes udebs when preparing that release. Note that Luks based encryption is not affected. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201003091806.50485.elen...@planet.nl