On Monday 19 July 2010, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Christian PERRIER <bubu...@debian.org> wrote: > > The packages I released were tagged with the attached script, > > contributed by Joey back in.....a long time ago..:-) > > > > Apparently, it does strip the epoch when calculating the tag. I guess > > this was on purpose. > > Yes but it breaks calc-translation-status and also conflicts with > debcommit behaviour; I think we need to "decide" which one is to be > the used format (with or without epoch). In my opinion debcommit > behaviour looks right and we ought to use epoch specially because we > can end up with same version in two different epochs without it.
Basing on debcommit seems the only correct option to me. Possibly a fallback to stripped epoch could be used to cover current cases. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201007192101.45980.elen...@planet.nl
