[reply-to set to d-d only]
On 20/10/2010 07:12, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek ([email protected]):
>
>>> On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm or
>>> operator
>>> be overloaded with this new functionality? (think Ockham's razor).
>>
>> No. Both of those groups also have other meanings.
>
>
> How about the "root" group?
This would hurt systems where umask is 002 (or 007) by default (the root
group is the primary group of the root user with nobody else in it)
Regards,
Vincent
--
Vincent Danjean GPG key ID 0x9D025E87 [email protected]
GPG key fingerprint: FC95 08A6 854D DB48 4B9A 8A94 0BF7 7867 9D02 5E87
Unofficial packages: http://moais.imag.fr/membres/vincent.danjean/deb.html
APT repo: deb http://people.debian.org/~vdanjean/debian unstable main
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
