> Quoting Robert Millan ([email protected]): > > Author: rmh > > Date: Tue Nov 30 18:34:05 2010 > > New Revision: 65817 > > > > Log: > > Add partman-zfs/i386 template to warn users who want to use ZFS on i386. > > > > Added: > > trunk/packages/partman/partman-zfs/check.d/zfs_i386 (contents, props > > changed) > > Modified: > > trunk/packages/partman/partman-zfs/check.d/_numbers > > trunk/packages/partman/partman-zfs/debian/changelog > > trunk/packages/partman/partman-zfs/debian/partman-zfs.templates > > I unmarked this for translation. > > My opinion, indeed, is that if ZFS is unsafe on kfreebsd-i386, then > partman-zfs should no tbe kfreebsd-any but only kfreebsd-amd64 > >
As suggested by Robert, I bring this to -bsd as well. My main point was that adding a new debconf template to a D-I package is, at this moment of the release process, not an option. Particularly if that template is about warning users for potential problems. --
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
