Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > On Sun, Nov 18, 2001 at 09:15:18PM +0100, Claus Hindsgaul wrote: > > > Code date translated up-to-date strings (out of 769) > > > ca 2001-10-15 774 > > How can there be 774 up-to-date strings out of 769? Are strings which are > no longer used considered up-to-date?
Very, very good question! It turns out, that ca.po is not mentioned in the Makefile, and thus not syncronized by "make update-po" (or used at all for anything!). After correcting this (please do so in CVS - also in /documentation/config), doing a new "make update-po" , the correct number turns out to be 718, not 774 --- still much better than the average :-) Claus Hindsgaul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
