On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 21:06, Neil Williams <[email protected]> wrote: ... > I cannot recommend any embedded system should use any version of > busybox built by Debian for d-i without *also* installing and using > coreutils, login, passwd, shadow, perl and all the rest. i.e. busybox > from Debian is only suitable for what Debian normally does with busybox > - which explicitly does *not* include handling passwords, shadow or > otherwise.
Please take a look on this thread: http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2011/02/msg00471.html Basically we're going to revamp busybox and busybox-static configuration (d-i one is not going to be changed too much) and then we wish to try to be more "friendly" to this kind of use-cases. Doing the proposed changes I guess we fit this gab. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
