On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 12:52:18PM +0200, J� Fahlke wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 02:27:33AM +0200, J� Fahlke wrote: > > > if eval "$@"; then > > to > > if "$@"; then > Hehe, simplicity! > I was wondering why the "eval" was there anyway. Be omitting it (or by > extra-quoting the arguments) you lose the ability to pass multiple > commands to repeat(), like this: > repeat 5 "echo \"You have to press enter 5 times.\"; read"
You can't do that anyway, though (not in any sensible fashion, at least). > If this was intended, indeed every call to repeat() must be fixed. And, uh, no calls to repeat look like that anyway. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. "Security here. Yes, maam. Yes. Groucho glasses. Yes, we're on it. C'mon, guys. Somebody gave an aardvark a nose-cut: somebody who can't deal with deconstructionist humor. Code Blue." -- Mike Hoye, see http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/armadillos.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
