What if we looked at the size of available swap rather than RAM?

People don't really expect to have their actual memory eaten by something
that appears to be a disk filesystem (and used to be one).  I'd say that
eating some of swap space would be less surprising.

In other words: a machine with 64MB RAM + swap will want to use tmpfs (much
faster than a regular filesystem), but one with 1-2GB and no swap probably
won't.

-- 
1KB             // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
                //      Never attribute to stupidity what can be
                //      adequately explained by malice.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to