Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org> writes: > On 16.12.2011 18:38, Joey Hess wrote: >> Christian PERRIER wrote:
>>> I'm inclined to follow this advice and would indeed propose that the >>> "atomic" partman-auto recipe is kept, however without a separate /usr >>> partition (discussions on -devel and the current practice convinced me >>> that a separate /usr is seomthing that probably belongs to the former >>> century..:-) >> I don't think that d-i should be on the leading edge of this >> discussion. Once Debian has made up its mind, d-i can be updated to >> follow the consensus. > To me it looks like there is broad consensus that a separate /usr > partition should be considered deprecated and this option removed from > the installer. There's a bit of disagreement over the deprecation part still, but I think there's a pretty good consensus that people with a separate /usr from / are doing so for fairly edge-case situations, such as wanting a partially encrypted file system, and hence are not the target audience for the pre-constructed partitioning choices in d-i. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aa6s5osa....@windlord.stanford.edu
