Brian Potkin, le Wed 17 Oct 2012 18:18:29 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed 17 Oct 2012 at 00:50:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > Brian Potkin, le Mon 15 Oct 2012 19:55:06 +0100, a écrit : > > > > > > Ok. How about adding the information to section 4.3.1, then? > > > > Sure, please rephrase to make your changes work in 4.3.1. Maybe it could > > be worth be inlined in the text instead of just a footnote. > > Thank you for the advice. > > A choice: two patches. One to alter the footnote, the other to put the > text inline. > > The second one makes the footnote redundant, But, stylistically, I've > never been fond of largish footnotes. It also does not seem to detract > from a user focussing on the Important note.
I preferred the second one indeed, thanks. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121227184748.GC5902@type
