On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 12:03:31AM +0100, Abou Al Montacir wrote:
> --- busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/fix-unxz-with-multiple-streams.patch
> 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/fix-unxz-with-multiple-streams.patch
> 2012-12-21 19:23:12.000000000 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +Author: Abou Al Montacir <abou.almonta...@sfr.fr>
> +Purpose: Fix decompression of multi stream XZ compressed files
> + (Closes: bug#686502)
> +
> +--- busybox-1.20.0~/archival/libarchive/decompress_unxz.c 2012-12-20
> 21:51:04.000000000 +0100
> ++++ busybox-1.20.0/archival/libarchive/decompress_unxz.c 2012-12-20
> 21:49:11.000000000 +0100
> +@@ -87,7 +87,17 @@ unpack_xz_stream(transformer_aux_data_t *aux, int src_fd,
> int dst_fd)
> + iobuf.out_pos = 0;
> + }
> + if (r == XZ_STREAM_END) {
> +- break;
> ++ if (iobuf.in_pos != iobuf.in_size) {
> ++ // Initialize decoder for new stream
> ++ xz_dec_end(state);
> ++ state = xz_dec_init(XZ_DYNALLOC, 64*1024*1024);
Why can't you use the existing call somewhere at the beginning? If I
remember correctly, you need 128*1024*1024 to decompress all valid
files.
> ++ // Eat padding
> ++ while (iobuf.in[iobuf.in_pos] == 0){
> ++ iobuf.in_pos += 1;
> ++ }
Padding is a multiple of _four_ bytes. Did you read the spec?
> ++ }
> ++ // Look for other streams
> ++ continue;
Does it bail out if there is no new stream?
Bastian
--
Men will always be men -- no matter where they are.
-- Harry Mudd, "Mudd's Women", stardate 1329.8
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130106203959.ga12...@waldi.eu.org
