On 02/06/2013 10:38 AM, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> On 02/06/2013 12:55 AM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> Is it the intention of the Release Managers not to accept a newer
>> version of syslinux into wheezy? [That is, if the CTTE were to decide
>> to require some "fix" to d-i, we'd also have to override the RMs?]
> 
> jftr, i never did nor intended to ask for having syslinux 5 in wheezy.
> what i care about is having it in unstable (for reasons said earlier).
> 

Well, the d-i development is happening in sid. Therefore, this upload
disrupted the development process of syslinux dependent d-i components
that have to end up, but are not yet in wheezy.

Milan


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to