Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [Sven Luther] > > as iso8859-1 is called latin1, i suppose it just makes sense to name > > iso8859-15 latin15 ? > > Not really. There is almost, but not quite, a direct mapping from > ISO-8859-<n> to latin<n>. If I recall correctly, at least > ISO-8859-11 is called latin9 for historical reasons, so you can not > assume a direct mapping.
Here's the mapping for fans of trivia: ISO 8859-1 Latin1 ISO 8859-2 Latin2 ISO 8859-3 Latin3 ISO 8859-4 Latin4 ISO 8859-5 Cyrillic ISO 8859-6 Arabic ISO 8859-7 Greek ISO 8859-8 Hebrew ISO 8859-9 Latin5 ISO 8859-10 Latin6 ISO 8859-11 Thai ISO 8859-12 reserved ISO 8859-13 Latin7 ISO 8859-14 Latin8 ISO 8859-15 Latin9 (also nicknamed Latin0) Kjetil T. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
