On May 22, 2013, at 7:02 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Indeed, some commits probably pertain to branches (as Cyril probably > already mentioned)mostly if they depend on packages that are not in > the archive.
I have tried my best to make it work even if they don't. Besides, they DO exist (most of the packages any way - I'm unsure which DO exist and which don't), but for kFreeBSD only at the moment. And where they are not (as with d-i and amd64), I made sure they aren't required, only optional so it should still work... It would be nice to have them reviewed and hopefully accepted, so that we can do the initial testing on kFreeBSD (which I don't use, but I could start :) and then it will be very well tested once spl/zfs is accepted in the ftp archives. > I think he did some such changes (sorry for the extra work, > Cyril....though I think that giving Turbo commit access is the best way > to guarantee is work is not ignored (as it was until now...)) Sorry about the mess, I had no idea stuff was hyper-automatic behind the scenes. And I WAS told to push to master :D But what happened to the commits, where they moved to a separate branch? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
