Hi, Michael Biebl (2013-07-20): > as part of the udev update to version 204 (in experimental), the > udev-gtk-udeb package was renamed to libudev1-udeb to better reflect > what the package actually contains. > > This will be aligned with the libudev0→libudev1 soname bump, so it > seemed like a good occasion to do the rename of the udeb package as > part of that library transition.
FWIW, I'm still not convinced this soname bump is a good idea at all aassuming it's still the removal of a few functions that triggers it). > So from what I see, a simple rebuild of xserver-xorg-core-udeb should > suffice to pick up the new name. And this rebuild will happen for the > libudev library transition anyways. That's not sufficient AFAICT: | Package: libusb-1.0-0-udeb | Source: libusbx | Version: 2:1.0.16-1 | Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.17), udev-gtk-udeb > Of course libudev1.shlibs was updated accordingly: > libudev 1 libudev1 > udeb: libudev 1 libudev1-udeb > > That said, as I don't know much about d-i, I thought I'll let you know > in advance, before we upload that package to unstable. That's OK. The tricky part is just to keep shipping the shlibs file even if a symbol file is present, since symbols don't work for udebs. I see debian-experimental has the --add-udeb for dh_makeshlibs so you're apparently good to go. Mraw, KiBi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
