Hi, Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 12:14 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Holger Wansing, le Mon 04 Aug 2014 11:55:43 +0200, a écrit : > > > =================================================================== > > > --- en/partitioning/tree.xml (Revision 69218) > > > +++ en/partitioning/tree.xml (Arbeitskopie) > > > @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ > > > <entry>Mount point for mounting a file system temporarily</entry> > > > </row><row> > > > <entry><filename>proc</filename></entry> > > > - <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4 and 2.6 > > > kernels)</entry> > > > + <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.4, 2.6 and 3.x > > > kernels)</entry> > > > > I wouldn't even mention the version: I've seen /proc for as long as I > > can remember. > > I agree. > > > > @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ > > > <entry>Essential system binaries</entry> > > > </row><row> > > > <entry><filename>sys</filename></entry> > > > - <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 kernels)</entry> > > > + <entry>Virtual directory for system information (2.6 and 3.x > > > kernels)</entry> > > > > I'd rather patch into "Linux 2.6 and further", I don't think /sys is to > > go away. > > I agree. > > Ben.
kfreebsd came to my mind. We have d-i manual for kfreebsd versions, too. And /proc + /sys also exists on a kfreebsd system. Maybe drop all the information within the brackets? Holger -- Holger Wansing <[email protected]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
