Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> (2014-08-26): > Christian PERRIER <[email protected]> (2014-08-26): > > While adding i18n to partman-iscsi, I noticed that it is a sta,ndard > > component of D-I. My understanding of iSCSI devices is that this is > > quite a corner case for installation. Therefore, shouldn't the package > > be "priority: optional". The consequence would be that iSCSI > > partitioning wouldn't be showing up in partman menus in default > > installs.....but only when users of expert mode choose to load to udeb. > > I'm no expert but that looks good to me.
OK, I'm going to take that back.
Julien pointed out on IRC that iSCSI is much more common than I initially
thought, as opposed to multipath or nbd (which indeed are optional), and
Colin that hiding iSCSI wouldn't be a huge service to our users.
Therefore it looks to me that standard is the proper value.
If we want to avoid showing untranslated material in a default install, it
might be sufficient to make sure the partman-iscsi/text/configure_iscsi
string is translated in all languages first; and translators can keep up
with the other strings of this package whenever they have time?
I understand extra strings are no fun. But the freeze is still a few weeks
away, and l10n-{only,mostly} uploads/migrations are very much possible;
remember the bulk of l10n changes I reviewed/approved during the wheezy
freeze. ;)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
