In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Di Carlo writes: >Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> In message <20011228043508.GB218@Obsession>, Chris Tillman writes: >> >robster, who volunteered for the project, is committing changes in one >> >branch at version 1.61.2.4, while others are working in the trunk at >> >version 1.72. I suspect the differences are slight, but they should be >> >merged? >> >> Right, yeah. Presumably this branch is the old "woody" one, and robster is >> working on it by mistake? > >Yes, Josip Rodin builds the documentation which is used for >www.d.o/dists/woody, and I can assure you he's not using the branch! >So Robster better get his act together.
Has this been sorted out yet? From a quick look at the CVS logs it doesn't appear so. The longer the branch stays forked the more of a mess it will be when it's finally merged back. p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
