On Tue, 19 May 2015 14:57:37 +0100 Philip Hands <[email protected]> wrote:
> I presume this produces the same effect: > > case "$device" in > /dev/mmcblk0rpmb | /dev/mmcblk0boot? ) continue ;; > esac > > (which has the benefit of needing no forks) > > BTW How sure are we that mmcblk0 and mmcblk1 are going to always turn up > that way round? I'd think that the presence of the rpmb/boot0/1 suffix > is the real key, in which case one could do: > Hi, Phil. Thanks for the suggestion here. Yes, you are right. I completely lost the key point here. Your patch makes more sense. I am not familiar with the process here, but I think the credit should be yours for this bug and the fix you mentioned, so could you help send out a patch again for this bug? Thank you. Regards, Tsung-Han > case "$device" in > /dev/mmcblk?rpmb | /dev/mmcblk?boot? ) continue ;; > esac > > Cheers, Phil. > -- > |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd. > |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/ > |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
