On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 01:08 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2015-11-09 at 14:18 -0800, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Ian Campbell <[email protected]> [2015-11-09 08:37]: > > > It might be the same issue as this recent installation report: > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804351 > > > > > > I've not had a chance to dig into what is going on there. Often > this > > > kind of thing turns out to be an upstream change to the modules > > > (different config options, splitting modules into more fine > grained > > > parts) which requires tweaks to the kernel config, or initramfs > -tools > > > or to the kernel udebs for the installer. > > > > There was a report on the QNAP forum about a QNAP no longer booting > > after an update. The logs says: > > > > [ 8.697480] sdb: sdb1 > > [ 8.702144] sda: sda1 sda2 sda3 > > [ 8.705613] sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk > > [ 8.713159] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk > > Begin: Loading essential drivers ... modprobe: module > of:NocpTCsimple-bus not found in modules.dep > > modprobe: module of:NgpioT<NULL>Cmarvell,orion-gpio not found in > modules.dep > > modprobe: module of:NocpT<NULL>Csimple-bus not found in modules.dep > > modprobe: module of:NgpioTCmarvell,orion-gpio not found in > modules.dep > > modprobe: module of:NocpT<NULL>Csimple-bus not found in modules.dep > > modprobe: module of:Nsata-phyT<NULL>Cmarvell,mvebu-sata-phy not > found in modules.dep > > modprobe: module of:NocpTCsimple-bus not found in modules.dep > > modprobe: module of:Nsata-phyTCmarvell,mvebu-sata-phy not found in > modules.dep > > modprobe: module of:NocpTCsimple-bus not found in modules.dep > > modprobe: module platform:reg-dummy not found in modules.dep > > done. > > Begin: Running /scripts/init-premount ... done. > > ... > > [ and then the UUID is not found ] > > > > Any idea what these messages about modules.dep are about? > > All those modaliases correspond to devices whose drivers are built-in. > So it's not surprising that they're not found in modules.dep, and I > don't think this has anything to do with the failure.
Indeed, I've been seeing them for a while and I don't believe they are anything more than a cosmetic issue. Ian.
