Would anyone mind if we use the ide-scsi driver instead of ide-cd as-default on the bf2.4 flavor? Additionaly, I suggest to put ide-scsi in the first lines into default /etc/modules file, so it is loaded first when the user changes to Xu's kernel-image package.
Reason: - ide-cd, ide-floppy, and ide-type implement parts of the SCSI standards (ie. MMC). ATAPI is not a uniq protocol, it is just a tunnel over IDE for SCSI protocols - ide* drivers just duplicate the code. Using ide-scsi saves lots of kilobyte in the kernel. I was faced with the space problems while trying to include Compaq-Raid support in the bf2.4 kernel. So, any good reasons against it? If no, I will go ahead and change the defaults. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- ...mit VIM kein Problem! :wq -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
