On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 09:46:55AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Alexander Sosedkin <m...@unboiled.info> (2017-04-06): > > That's one way to think about it. Got it, keeping old modules is hard. > > But I wasn't asking about keeping old modules, I see no point in this. > > I was asking about generating and publishing a matching > > dists/testing/main/installer-<arch>/current on kernel upload. > > Why is _that_ hard? > > Because what's below testing/ was copied over from unstable/, and what's > below unstable/ is being copied from the results of the debian-installer > upload, which fetches its components from testing (that's our release > cycle works: we hammer testing into shape until it gets released as a > new stable). So a new kernel in unstable isn't sufficient to have all > the pieces together, that's why we have daily builds, and that's why you > keep being pointed at them.
Maybe people could be pointed to stable instead. As the debian-installer netboot packages are updated with each point release, kernel module mismatch/missing issues should be avoidable. Besides installing dist=stable by default, also testing and sid are supported. Just adding 'mirror/suite=testing' as additional param to the kernel command line is enough. (Someone wanting unstable would replace 'testing' with 'sid'.) Wolfgang
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature