Hi, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2021-05-29): > Apologies for letting this fall through the cracks for a while. > > As glib2.0 produces a udeb, this will need a KiBi-ack, so CCing and > tagging appropriately.
In the interest of not delaying this any further, I'd probably recommend accepting the package into p-u, and if for some reasons tests look bad when I get to them, I can always exclude prefer the version currently in buster through some apt_preferences when building d-i for 10.10… (And we would have up to 10.11 to find a fix.) Would that work for you? Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature