but yes its a 5 tree debian, oldstable stable testing unstable experimental
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022, 18:10 Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i > > On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 17:02 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > > Please consider an update to GnuPG in debian bullseye, from version > > 2.2.27-2 to 2.2.27-2+deb11u1. > > > > The version mentioned above is correct, but the proposed changelog is > not: > > +gnupg2 (2.2.27-2+deb11+1) bullseye; urgency=medium > > (it should be "deb11u1", not "deb11+1"). > it is unstable / experimental > > > The fixes, by Christoph Biedel and Raphaël Hertzog, are narrowly > > targeted and fix real, significant issues that a subset of users > > have. > > They have been in debian unstable and testing for a while now without > > issue: > > > > ------ > > [ Raphaël Hertzog ] > > * Avoid network interaction in generator. Closes: #993578 > > > > [ Christoph Biedl ] > > * Backport "Scd: Fix CCID driver for SCM SPR332/SPR532". Closes: > > #982546 > > ------ > > > > The debdiff from the version in bullseye (2.2.27-2) is attached. > > Thanks. > > That looks fine to me, but will need a d-i ack as the package builds a > udeb; tagging and CCing accordingly. > these doesnt tell me anythjng, im no debian dev > > Regards, > > Adam > >
