Your message dated Mon, 26 Sep 2022 00:13:53 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#1020694: Different ABI d-i-packages in
linux-source-package
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020694,
regarding Different ABI d-i-packages in linux-source-package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1020694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020694
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: minor
Version: 20210731+deb11u5
Hello,
I see in linux sourcepackage in bullseye different ABI d-i-packages.
Example: linux sourcepackage 5.10.140-1:
This sourcepackage contains the binary packages:
- affs-modules-5.10.0-16-4kc-malta-di
- affs-modules-5.10.0-18-4kc-malta-di
There are some more d-i-packages with ABI -16 and ABI -18.
packages.debian.org shows for linux sourcepackage:
- bullseye: 5.10.140-1: 821 binary packages with ABI -16 and ABI -18
- bookworm: 5.19.6-1: 555 binary packages with ABI -1 only
I don't know, if this is intended or not.
I don't know also, if this affects only d-i-packages.
Best regards and thank you for your support.
Bernhard
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hallo Bernhard,
Bernhard <[email protected]> (2022-09-25):
> I see in linux sourcepackage in bullseye different ABI d-i-packages.
>
> Example: linux sourcepackage 5.10.140-1:
> This sourcepackage contains the binary packages:
> - affs-modules-5.10.0-16-4kc-malta-di
> - affs-modules-5.10.0-18-4kc-malta-di
> There are some more d-i-packages with ABI -16 and ABI -18.
Right, for various reasons, binary packages for the old ABIs are kept.
Updates can come via bullseye-proposed-updates and/or bullseye-security.
That's not a problem: when a new point release is published, usually,
the installer is rebuilt against the latest ABI available.
> packages.debian.org shows for linux sourcepackage:
> - bullseye: 5.10.140-1: 821 binary packages with ABI -16 and ABI -18
> - bookworm: 5.19.6-1: 555 binary packages with ABI -1 only
And now with -2.
> I don't know, if this is intended or not.
> I don't know also, if this affects only d-i-packages.
I'm not seeing any problems with what you're reporting, the number of
packages and ABIs in each suite evolves over time. Everything looks
nominal to me.
Closing this bug report accordingly, thanks for checking with us anyway.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
