Michael Tokarev <[email protected]> (2025-10-30): > [chattr lsattr] > > > The regular ones are interestingly provided by e2fsprogs, which has an > > e2fsprogs twin where those could probably be added. Any reasons to ↑ e2fsprogs-udeb is what I meant to write
> > prefer the busybox implementation over e2fsprogs's or the other way > > around? > > To me there's not much point to provide an extra udeb while busybox's > ones are sufficient, and while most other tools in D-I are built on top > of busybox. Just to clarify: It was not about adding an extra udeb but about adding two more executables into an existing one. > Actually I'm surprised I haven't enabled them in busybox udeb long > time ago - I think I already come across this same problem before. > But I don't use D-I much, so that's most likely why. > > Enabling the two in udeb config... If you're happy to take the lead on this and to enable those two applets, that's fine with me, thanks! Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
