Dixi quod… >(Given this, I’m not sure console-setup needs to change here, but >it’s not entirely unlikely that something may wish to use these >fonts without the unimap, so IMHO the compilation process should >make sure that the glyphs #33‥#126 should be their ASCII counter‐ >parts, and that either #32 or #0 should be the empty glyph.
Turns out they do, I inspected the generated unimap, and #32‥#126 do correspond to their ASCII equivalents. >slightly argue in favour of #32 here, which Linux should then make >its numbered fallback glyph for unimap-less fonts.) This, then. (So, basically, the “ch = 0x20;” suggestion from Helge, except only for unimap-less fonts.) bye, //mirabilos -- 15:39⎜«mika:#grml» mira|AO: "mit XFree86® wär’ das nicht passiert" - muhaha 15:48⎜<thkoehler:#grml> also warum machen die xorg Jungs eigentlich alles kaputt? :) 15:49⎜<novoid:#grml> thkoehler: weil sie als Kinder nie den gebauten Turm selber umschmeissen durften? -- ~/.Xmodmap wonders…
