Paul Gevers <[email protected]> (2026-03-28): > Correct, if you add a not installable dependency to something that's still > installable. If this would happen often, you could stop building packages on > i386 and get the binaries removed on that architecture. You can see in the > current ongoing r-cran-* turn-around that that might be more work than it's > worth.
Since we know about this specific issue, and provided the release team is happy to process a few hint requests if and when this problem arises again… and unless we get an explicit request to nuke i386 out of the orbit, I think I'd rather avoid playing whack-a-mole with i386 binaries indeed. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois ([email protected]) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
