Hey Kibi! On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 01:07:54AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >Steve McIntyre <[email protected]> (2026-07-18): >> I can see that we're including bits of multiple kernels in the amd64 >> netinst at the moment, which is not going to help: >> >> .../2sidamd64$ grep :linux forky/make_disc_tree.log >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 111963 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-sysctl-defaults:5852:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 154674 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-base-7.0.13+deb14-amd64-di:44800:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 154697 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-base-7.0.14+deb14-amd64-di:44764:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 154720 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-base-7.1.3+deb14-amd64-di:44060:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 161459 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-binary-7.0.13+deb14-amd64-di:13792008:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 168173 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-binary-7.0.14+deb14-amd64-di:13748212:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 174915 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-binary-7.1.3+deb14-amd64-di:13803224:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 217814 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-base:26312:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 433073 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-base-7.1.3+deb14-amd64:406916:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 433076 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-base-amd64:1204:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 439818 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-binary-7.1.3+deb14-amd64:13802032:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: GUESS_TOTAL is 492701 after adding >> amd64:main:linux-modules-7.1.3+deb14-amd64:108302028:<DEFAULT> >> CD 1: Real current size is 492032 blocks after adding >> amd64:main:linux-modules-7.1.3+deb14-amd64:108302028:<DEFAULT> >> >> which leads to: >> >> CD 1 over-full (492032 > 488281). Rollback! >> CD 1: Real current size is 439296 blocks after rolling back >> amd64:main:linux-modules-7.1.3+deb14-amd64:108302028:<DEFAULT> >> No linux-image-* package(s) found >> >> so this isn't going to be helping. We already have code in debian-cd >> to limit the kernel version we're wanting to the latest, but that >> doesn't seem to be working here. > >That'd be tools/generate_di_list that works on -modules- (per code, >and as confirmed above) but not on -base-, -binary- (as seen above). >Looks to me replacing -modules- by -(?:base|binary|modules)- in both >regexes should help.
Nod, that's exactly what I was looking at (and hacking on last night before I ran out of brain). >I hadn't realized the split across several packages also happened on >the udeb side (see other mails regarding my inability to keep track of >stuff). Not sure whether we might have other similar packages… ACK. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. [email protected] "Every time you use Tcl, God kills a kitten." -- Malcolm Ray
