On Sep 07, Michael Tokarev <[email protected]> wrote:
After receiving several bug reports about busybox-static package and its issues initrd, a bigger question come to mind -- Why do we need these statically-linked utilities these days?
I need busybox-static basically to do things like: deboostrap ... /mnt/ cd / busybox ash mkdir OLD mv * OLD/ mv OLD/mnt/* .Actually I wanted do deprecate sash in favour of busybox-static, which is much more capable.
For recovery I think that grml-rescueboot beats everything. :-) -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
