Your message dated Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:10:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line implemented by debian-cd folks
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2001 05:14:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 24 23:14:39 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (arroz.fake) [::ffff:64.22.101.122]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14Lek3-0003rp-00; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 23:14:39 -0600
Received: from arroz.fake (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by arroz.fake (Postfix) with ESMTP id C282193807
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 00:15:17 -0500 (EST)
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Re: HPT366 install disks: do we have them?
Date: 25 Jan 2001 00:15:17 -0500
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 129
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-="
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=-=-=
Package: boot-floppies
Version: 2.2.21
Severity: wishlist
--=-=-=
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Disposition: inline
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 03:47:45 -0500
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from queso.onShore.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by arroz.fake (Postfix) with ESMTP id D61D993807
for <apharris@localhost>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 03:47:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailgw.onshore.com (mailgw.onshore.com [206.69.89.32])
by queso.onshore.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id CAA14344
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:38:41 -0600
Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [216.234.231.5])
by mailgw.onshore.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id CAA27030
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:25:38 -0600
Received: from murphy.debian.org [::ffff:216.234.231.6]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14LLRt-0004WL-00; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:38:37 -0600
Received: (qmail 15726 invoked by uid 38); 24 Jan 2001 08:38:35 -0000
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 15696 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2001 08:38:35 -0000
Received: from proxy2.ba.best.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2001 08:38:35 -0000
Received: from shell3.ba.best.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [206.184.139.134])
by proxy2.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with SMTP id AAA03577
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:37:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by shell3.ba.best.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:37:32
-0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 00:37:31 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HPT366 install disks: do we have them?
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, Jan 23, 2001
at 08:43:58PM -0500
Resent-Message-ID: <657dDD.A.l1D.LSpb6@murphy>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/16133
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 02:38:37 -0600
X-UIDL: 64cc2d3f2fc9b290aba2ba639d33dc1d
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Jan 23, 2001 at 08:43:58PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Philip Brown) writes:
>
> > but that is not user-friendly at all. There should be a *single* unified
> > .bat file at the top level, that prompts the user, with a brief
> > explaination as to why there is a choice.
>
> That's probably true. Patches accepted. Obviously, we're not very
> strong on DOS batch programming here.
Well damn, you just did your annouce of new boot disks right before I was
ready to send you the "patch" :-/
Anyways, I'm sending this to debian-boot, even though you originally replied
to me in debian-devel, because I'm guessing this is the better place.
Please note, however, that I am NOT subscribed to debian-boot.
A few notes here:
* I could care less about boot floppies: I boot directly from cdrom.
* What follows is a suggested replacement for (debian 2.2)
(/cdrom)/install/boot.bat
which is a "boot from msdos" util script, not the default "boot from cdrom"
script. I'm not sure where that is, otherwise I'd offer a suggestion for
that, too.
* BTW: http://www.nc5.infi.net/~wtnewton/batch/batguide.html
------------------------------------------------------------
@echo off
rem Flush any write-cached disk blocks before we leave DOS.
smartdrv /c
echo Please choose a linux kernel now
echo 1= standard kernel (2.2)
echo 2= compact kernel (2.2)
echo 3= SCSI kernel (2.2)
echo 4= experimental support enabled (2.4.0)
choice /c:1234
if errorlevel 4 goto FOUR
if errorlevel 3 goto THREE
if errorlevel 2 goto TWO
if errorlevel 1 goto ONE
echo doing default somehow and going to ONE
goto ONE
:ONE
echo using standard kernel
loadlin.exe linux root=/dev/ram ro initrd=root.bin
:TWO
echo using compact kernel
loadlin.exe lincompt root=/dev/ram ro initrd=root.bin
:THREE
echo using SCSI kernel
loadlin.exe linscsi root=/dev/ram ro initrd=root.bin
:FOUR
echo using eXperimental kernel
loadlin.exe linXprmt root=/dev/ram ro initrd=root.bin extraopts=something
rem I would have liked to use variables for options but DOS doesnt
rem like having an equals-sign in a variable.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--=-=-=
--
.....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
--=-=-=--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 83470-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2002 21:10:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 16 16:10:57 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (uni-kl.de) [131.246.137.52]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16xaE4-0004Jt-00; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:10:57 -0500
Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de (mailgate1.uni-kl.de [131.246.120.5])
by uni-kl.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g3GLAsa08748
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:10:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.54])
by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g3GLAsrK027196
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:10:54 +0200
Received: from domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (domino.informatik.uni-kl.de
[131.246.161.19])
by mailinf.rhrk.uni-kl.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g3GLAq705451
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:10:52 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from zombie (rotes255.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.65])
by domino.informatik.uni-kl.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g3GLAsS23414
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:10:54 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from inet by zombie with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 16xaE4-0003Hy-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:10:56 +0200
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:10:56 +0200
From: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: implemented by debian-cd folks
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by uni-kl.de id g3GLAsa08748
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject says all.
--=20
<Alfie> Getty: Solche Aussagen t=E4tigt man hier nicht - sonst kommt
wieder der weasel daher und zitiert einen auf der #-Seite!
-- #debian.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
