On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 07:43:45PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Michael Bramer wrote: > > A debian package maintainer don't need some reasons for a new package. > > If the package is free and someone make the work, the ftp master(s) > > should include the package on the debian ftp server. > Not without good reason, and not if there is a consensus against or > significant controversy around it. apt-i18n fails on at least 2 counts.
And not when it involves an essential package. mutt-ja is a different matter to apt-i18n. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
