On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 09:20:39PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote:
> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > > If in the DDP CVS area, should it be packaged as well? I
> > > > > think it will need to be...
> > > >
> > > > It can be packaged from there too, I don't see how that would
> > > > necessarily impede the packaging process.
> > >
> > > No, it's just more work to be done is all....
> >
> > Is it packaged anywhere now?
>
> Yes, install-doc.
Are you talking CVS version? As far as I look into debian archive, I
see install-doc as a part of boot-floppies source tree and install-doc
is only a binary package name. (I think Josip is talking about
install-doc as an independent source package.) I am confused !@#$???
Package: boot-floppies
Binary: install-doc
Version: 3.0.22
Priority: extra
Section: doc
...
Package: boot-floppies
Binary: install-doc
Version: 3.0.23 (unstable)
Priority: extra
Section: devel
...
> I think it would be a serious mistake to think we can eliminate the
> arch-specific portions of the install manual.
I tend to agree on this.
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
