On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:01:40AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:10:47PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo wrote: > > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > debian-boot-cvs, by analogy with debbugs and www? > > > > No -- again, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Managed by > > the PTS system. > > So ... asking as a BTS admin, where should bug reports for the d-i > packages be cc'ed? Also installer notifications. It seems strange for > them to be cc'ed to anything other than > [EMAIL PROTECTED] in this case - after all, > the PTS was in large part conceived as a way to get around the fact that > the BTS doesn't have any other subscription mechanism (although it > broadcasts katie's notifications too). In that case, we would have to > start maintaining a source override for every d-i .udeb. But the bug > reports should probably still go to debian-boot, so I'm now confused > about how this fits into the way the PTS is used elsewhere.
Oh no, this last wouldn't be a concern, because the Maintainer: of the d-i .udebs is debian-boot. So ignore that bit. -- Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
