* Thomas Viehmann wrote: > (But as Sebastian points out, a mini-X-Server might be preferred.)
I am still looking for killer arguments for/against one of the two solutions: X server vs. libdirectfb. If I might start: For libdirectfb: - small - easy to setup - very actively maintained - fast - already packaged Against libdirectfb: - vt switching not supported. This is only for the moment, I just recieved word, that it is supported in the cvs version - gtk terminal widgets do not work with gtk-directfb - does not (yet?) support vga16fb For X: - Most versatile - terminal widgets work with X - should work with any fb device (espacially vga16fb) Against X: - larger than libdirectfb (is this true?) - slower (my impression) - crashed when switching vts (only in my case?) - more difficult to configure (is this true?) Please add to this list and state your opinions what the better of the two solutions might be. Regards, Sebastian -- PGP-Key: http://www.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de/~sebastian.ley/public.key Fingerprint: A46A 753F AEDC 2C01 BE6E F6DB 97E0 3309 9FD6 E3E6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
