Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [Thu 03 Jul 07:23:21]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) around? > > > [Thu 03 Jul 07:25:37]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) testing out loading 1.6c for bf2.4... > > > [Thu 03 Jul 07:25:43]([EMAIL PROTECTED]) if it works we should NMU it no? > > 1.6c is what?
Loadlin upstream fix to work for kernels > 1MB. I tested it and I confirmed loadlin will work with 1.6c but not with (current) 1.6a. > BF is flawed a bit in the current CVS version. kernel-image-2.4.20 has > modules conflicting with pcmcia-modules-2.4.20 and I am not willing to > use this kernel version as-is because of the catastrophal IDE performance. > I tried to build kernel-image-2.4.21 for LinuxTag CDs, but it failed to > compile with gcc-2.95. And finaly, I do not have much spare time to fix > it :( Interesting. What modules conflict with the PCMCIA? I just installed using your 3.0.24 and the bf2.4 image on Thinkpad 560X using PCMCIA for network install. I might be getting "catastrophic" IDE performance but I'm not sure I would recognize it -- the laptop is new to me. I guess I should plan, for my personal computer, to build/use a 2.4.21 kernel which I have recompiled. -- ...Adam Di Carlo...<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.......<URL:http://www.onshored.com/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
