Your message dated Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:31:40 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs fixed in d-i non-NMUs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2003 20:42:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 12 15:42:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ms-2.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de) [134.130.3.131] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1A8n36-0007Ug-00; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 15:42:44 -0500
Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31])
 by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12 (built Feb 13 2003))
 with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:42:44 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from relay.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.3.1])
        by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Sun,
 12 Oct 2003 22:42:43 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mx.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de
 (mx.mmweg.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.118.4])      by relay.rwth-aachen.de
 (8.12.10/8.12.7-1) with SMTP id h9CKggsU007929 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
 Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:42:42 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 6107 invoked by alias); Sun, 12 Oct 2003 20:42:43 +0000
Received: (qmail 6088 invoked from network); Sun, 12 Oct 2003 20:42:42 +0000
Received: from coyote.mmweg (134.130.118.117) by hub.mmweg with SMTP; Sun,
 12 Oct 2003 20:42:42 +0000
Received: from sl by coyote.mmweg with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 1A8n34-0005iy-00; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:42:42 +0200
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:42:42 +0200
From: Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation: Relocation error while executing anna
Sender: Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.34
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: installation
Severity: grave
File: installation
Tags: d-i
Justification: renders package unusable

I use a recent daily build of the businesscard image (12.10.2003). After
I choose my language, d-i loads some kernel modules and then fires up
anna, which fails at a point, leaving the following error message in
syslog:

sh: relocation error: /bin/sh: symbol __register_frame_info, version
GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference

Same happens when I want to start a shell on tty2. However I can start a
shell on tty2 _before_ anna has run.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux coyote 2.4.22-1-k7 #5 Sat Oct 4 14:11:12 EST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------
Received: (at 215444-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2003 00:27:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 30 18:27:31 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AFN8V-0001qg-00; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:27:31 -0600
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs2-81.access.naxs.com [216.98.91.81])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
        (Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
        by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id E344317E7C; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 00:27:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 5166D6E0EE; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:31:41 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 19:31:40 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs fixed in d-i non-NMUs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_60
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_28 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

These bugs were marked as closed in a NMU, but in fact it was not a NMU.
Therefore I'm closing them.

--=20
see shy jo

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/oa1sd8HHehbQuO8RApxrAJ4sn+if+CVGYxyE01uyWkjmDagw9gCgnjU0
3hwP0PNUcUL7umE+16Cx5qc=
=BfqM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to