On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:13:44 +1100 Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> pipe-progress is the only non-busybox binary in bootfloppy-initrd, > pipe-progress is very simple and could easily assimilated by busybox. > > Having only one binary in the first initrd would open the possibility > of compiling it statically, this would eliminate the requirment for > ld-linux.so.2 which is 89kB on i386. > > I think static binaries may be marginally smaller than a binary + > dynamic library (after library reduction) due to some library > overheads, it is a very marginal savings though i think. Comparing static glibc busybox against shared library reduced glibc. busybox.static 578456 (277656 compressed with gzip) busybox.shared 94668 (56116) ld-linux.so.2 90144 (46709) libc.so.6 542664 (240184) Total Shared 727476 (343009) Total Static 578456 (277656) Uncompressed saving 149 kB Compressed saving 65 kB Comparing static uClibc busybox against shared library reduced glibc. busybox-static-uclibc 144276 (80525) Total Shared (glibc) 727476 (343009) Total Static (uclibc) 144276 (80525) Uncompressed saving 583 kB Compressed saving 262 kB Moving to uclibc and a static binary will make a lot of difference, certainly give us a lot more flexibility in kernel features. uClibc can be a shared library, but i didnt consider that in this comparison. Glenn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
