Your message dated Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:32:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line similar change was made by joeyh
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Dec 2003 08:59:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 16 02:59:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from onera.onera.fr [144.204.65.4] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AWB0n-0001pL-00; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 02:57:06 -0600
Received: from mykerinos.onera (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by onera.onera.fr  with ESMTP id hBG8uuwu026016;
        Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:56:56 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (mykerinos.onera [127.0.0.1])
        by mykerinos.onera (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 1DFF9D065; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:56:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mykerinos.onera ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (mykerinos [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 08684-09; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:56:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mykerinos.onera (Postfix, from userid 7426)
        id 3DF74D063; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:56:55 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0644363224=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netcfg: Changes to templates for clearer choices offered
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:56:54 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p5 (Debian) at mykerinos
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
        2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===============0644363224==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: netcfg
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

I propose the attached changes to debconf tempaltes for netcfg. Basically,
this means changing the "Dynamic addressing" choice by "Automatic network
configuration" choice, which is probably easier to understand (and closer to
reality).

The wording for "static addressing" also changes to "Manual configuration".

The proposed changes impacts the netcfg/get_method choices, so changes to
scripts handling the user choices are probably needed.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux mykerinos 2.6.0-test11 #1 Fri Dec 12 10:25:56 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8)


--===============0644363224==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch"

diff -Nru netcfg.ori/debian/netcfg-common.templates 
netcfg/debian/netcfg-common.templates
--- netcfg.ori/debian/netcfg-common.templates   2003-12-16 09:45:29.000000000 +0100
+++ netcfg/debian/netcfg-common.templates       2003-12-16 09:48:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 Template: netcfg/get_method
 Type: select
-Default: configure network with DHCP
-_Choices: configure network with DHCP, manual network configuration
+Default: Automatic configuration (DHCP)
+_Choices: Automatic configuration (DHCP), Manual configuration
 _Description: Network configuration method
  Networking can either be configure by DHCP or by manually 
  entering all the information. If you choose DHCP and 
  debian-installer is unable to get a working configuration
  from a DHCP Server on you network you will be offered to configure
- your network manually after the atempt to configure it by DHCP. If
- unsure choose DHCP.
+ your network manually after the attempt to configure it by DHCP. If
+ unsure, choose DHCP.
 
 Template: netcfg/get_domain
 Type: string
diff -Nru netcfg.ori/debian/netcfg-dhcp.templates netcfg/debian/netcfg-dhcp.templates
--- netcfg.ori/debian/netcfg-dhcp.templates     2003-12-16 09:45:29.000000000 +0100
+++ netcfg/debian/netcfg-dhcp.templates 2003-12-16 09:47:04.000000000 +0100
@@ -43,9 +43,9 @@
 Template: netcfg/dhcp-title
 Type: text
 #  Title displayed when configuring this package
-_Description: DHCP Network Configuration
+_Description: Automatic network configuration (DHCP)
 
 Template: debian-installer/netcfg-dhcp/title
 Type: text
 #  Item in the main menu to select this package
-_Description: Configure the network using dynamic addressing (DHCP)
+_Description: Automatically configure the network (DHCP)
diff -Nru netcfg.ori/debian/netcfg-static.templates 
netcfg/debian/netcfg-static.templates
--- netcfg.ori/debian/netcfg-static.templates   2003-12-16 09:45:29.000000000 +0100
+++ netcfg/debian/netcfg-static.templates       2003-12-16 09:46:27.000000000 +0100
@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@
 Template: netcfg/static-title
 Type: text
 #  Title displayed when configuring this package
-_Description: Static Network Configuration
+_Description: Manual network configuration
 
 Template: debian-installer/netcfg-static/title
 Type: text
 #  Item in the main menu to select this package
-_Description: Configure a network using static addressing
+_Description: Manually configure the network

--===============0644363224==--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 224131-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2003 00:52:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 23 18:52:50 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail4.bluewin.ch [195.186.4.74] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1AYw3u-00085h-00; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:35:38 -0600
Received: from tigerente (213.3.130.30) by mail4.bluewin.ch (Bluewin AG 7.0.024)
        id 3FBC839800472EE0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:35:38 +0000
Received: from steinlin by tigerente with local (masqmail 0.2.20) id
 1AYw0q-1qY-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 24 Dec 2003
 00:32:28 +0100
Subject: similar change was made by joeyh
From: Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:32:28 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
        2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15
X-Spam-Level: 

A similar change in the wording has been made by Joey Hess. I'm
therefore closing this bug. Please feel free to reopen it if you think
the wording is not clear enough.

Gaudenz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to